A- de 2017
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos
✓Claimant Reinel Camilo Claros Leon
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Se confirma en su integridad el auto recurrido
- Incumplimiento de requisitos de especificidad y certeza
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica interpuesto en contra del auto que rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia, por cuanto el actor no corrigió los yerros observados en el auto inadmisorio.
Como quiera que no se consiguió refutar las consideraciones jurídicas que sirvieron de sustento a la providencia recurrida, la Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió CONFIRMARLA.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el auto del 20 de septiembre de 2017, por el cual se rechazó la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Reinel Camilo Claros León en contra del numeral 3 del artículo 30 de la Ley 80 de 1993, dentro del expediente con número de radicación D-12258.
- SEGUNDO. Contra esta providencia no cabe recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.